Abstract: The present study is devoted to the description of the methodology for predicting word combinations equivalent to compound abbreviated appellatives, which is based on the use of the correlation of semantic cases of equivalent word combinations and structural schemes of a relational deciphering stimulus. The relevance of the work is determined by the fact that it is a description of the applied part of the methodology for compiling the “Explanatory Dictionary of Compound Words”, and also by the fact that, on a synchronous cut of the language, the relational deciphering stimulus is a productive unit of the equivalence nest, which, realizing the actant-numerical semantics of the presentative and modifier, reflects various semantic roles of the abbroconstruct of a compound word. The object is a relational deciphering stimulus, i.e. such a regular model for deciphering an abbreviation that implements the actant and actant-numeric characteristics of the presentative and modifier. The purpose of the article is to describe the methodology for filling gaps in the equivalence nest of a compound abbreviated appellative. The paper uses linguistic methods and techniques for analyzing units equivalent to a compound word, in particular onomasiological - to clarify semantic roles in the formation of nests of equivalence and abbreviation pairs, a descriptive method to derive a general idea of relational semantics in the nest of equivalence of compound words, the formalization method was used in building models formal structure; component analysis was used to study the structure of specific equivalence nests; with the help of quantitative analysis, the language material was selected. The use of basic methods of analysis and synthesis made it possible to determine the patterns of not only the formation of tokens, but also lemmas that activate the semantics of the abbroconstruct, to substantiate the semantic dependence of the onomasiological feature on the onomasiological basis when predicting compound abbreviated appellatives, to establish the parameters for filling in the table of relational decoding stimuli and the prediction matrix. The obtained theoretical conclusions can be used in the collection and processing of lexicographic material, compilation of dictionaries, as well as in the study of word-formation processes of the modern Russian language and the description of specific abbreviation groups.
Keywords: compound word, token, lemma, equivalence nest, deciphering stimulus, prediction, matrix, semantic cases.
For citation: Mikhailova E.N. Prediction of Relational Deciphering Stimuli of Compound Abbreviated Appellatives. Current Issues in Philology and Pedagogical Linguistics. 2022, no 2, pp. 16–27. (In Russ.).
Bionote:
Ekaterina N. Mikhailova
Donetsk National University,
24 Universitetskaya Str., Donetsk, Donetsk People’s Republic, 283001;
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-0271-9698
References:
1. Terkulov VI. Materials for the Glossary of Terms of the Experimental Laboratory for Research of Abbreviation Tendencies. East Slavic Philology. 2016; 3(29): 13-25. Available at: http://www.gifl1949.ru/images/Documents/Sborniki/ВСФ%20Языкознание%203(29).pdf. Accessed May 15, 2022. (In Russ.)
2. Ryazanova VA. Methods for Predicting Equivalence Relations in Hybrid Groups. New Horizons of Russian Studies. 2018; 6: 44-49. Available at: https://donnu.ru/public/journals/files/NGR_6_2018.pdf. Accessed May 15, 2022. (In Russ.).
3. Ustinova IA. Prediction in the Equivalence Nest of a Compound Word. New Horizons of Russian Studies. 2018; 6: 49–55. Available at: https://donnu.ru/public/journals/files/NGR_6_2018.pdf. Accessed May 15, 2022. (In Russ.).
4. Brovets AI. Deciphering Stimulus of a Compound Word: to the Problem of Definition and Description. Russian Studies. 2019; 4(17): 487-501. https://journals.rudn.ru/russian-language-studies/article/view/22437. Accessed May 15, 2022. (In Russ.).
5. Alamairekh EYu. Formal Equivalence of a Compound Word in Synchrony and Diachrony. Russian Language in a Multicultural World: Sat. scientific articles. 2017: 157–161. (In Russ.).
6. Andronova AV. Controversial Issues of the Typology of Compound Words. Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod State University N.I. Lobachevsky Named. Philology Series. 2003; 1(3): 117-123. Available at: http://www.unn.ru/pages/issues/vestnik/99990196_West_filol_2003_1(3)/B_3-4.pdf. Accessed May 15, 2022. (In Russ.).
7. Ryazanova VA. Mutant Abbreviation-Composite Groups in the Word-Formation System of the Language. Bulletin of Moscow University. 2017; 6: 108–116. http://dx.doi.org/10.25688/2076-913X.2021.43.3.15. Accessed May 15, 2022. (In Russ.).
8. Terkulov VI. Complex Abbreviated Appellatives as an Autonomous Variety of Abbreviations. Russian Studies. 2020; 1(18): 97–112. http://dx.doi.org/10.22363/2618-8163-2020-18-1-97-112. Accessed May 15, 2022. (In Russ.).
9. Borovikova NA. Field Structures in the Language System. Voronezh; Publishing House of Voronezh University; 1989. (In Russ.).
10. Vishnyakova EA. The Place of Abbreviation in the Word-Formation System of the Modern English Language. Scientific Statements of the Belgorod State University. Series «Humanities». 2014; 6(177): 62–66. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/mesto-abbreviatsii-v-slovoobrazovatelnoy-sisteme-sovremennogo-angl.... Accessed May 15, 2022. (In Russ.).
11. Ryadinskaya SV, Migachiov VA. Ch. Fillmore’s Case Grammar and Modern Understanding of the Role Semantics of the Verb. Foreign Languages in Vocational Education. 2006: 175–180. Available at: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/151220395.pdf. Accessed May 15, 2022. (In Russ.).
12. Li Z, Zhao H, He S, Cai J. Syntax Role for Neural Semantic Role Abeling. Computational Linguistics. 2021; 3(47): 529-574. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/COLIa00408. Accessed May 15, 2022. (In Engl.).
13. Barsalou LW. Categories at the Interface of Cognition and Action. Studies in Language Companion Series. 2021; 220: 35–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/slcs.220.03bar. Accessed May 15, 2022. (In Engl.).
14. Huyghe RI, Wauquier M. Distributional Semantics Insights on Agentive Suffix Rivalry in French. Word Structure. 2021; 3(14):354-391. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/word.2021.0194. Accessed May 15, 2022. (In Engl.).
15. Yarmashevich MA. Significance Of Abbreviated Units. Bulletin of the Orenburg State University. 2002; 6: 106-110. Available at: http://vestnik.osu.ru/doc/1226/article/1032/lang/0. Accessed May 15, 2022. (In Russ.).
16. Ilyenko AA, Pozdnyakova SYu. Basic Word-Formation Models of German Aviation Terminology. Youth Bulletin of Irkutsk National Research Technical University. 2014; 3:20-20. Available at: http://мвестник.рф//journals/2014/03/articles/20. Accessed May 15, 2022. (In Russ.).
17. Krestyaninova ES. Hierarchy of Deciphering Stimuli in the Nest of Equivalence: to the Formulation of the Problem. New Horizons of Russian Studies Donetsk: DonNU. 2018: 27–33. Available at: https://donnu.ru/public/journals/files/NGR_4_2018.pdf. Accessed May 15, 2022. (In Russ.).
We recommend authors to read carefully the scope of our journal, the submission guidelines and malpractice statement. Original papers and studies developing new theoretical and applied issues are preferred. Such works are always cited, and citing your works reflects your status as a researcher.